Tag Archives: supreme court

The Affordable Care Act is Safe (even with Justice Barrett)

If only the Republicans had actually had a decent idea for replacing it! As the nomination of Judge Amy Coney Barrett to the Supreme Court proceeds, Barrett’s opponents have developed a powerful argument for getting Americans to join the opposition: … Continue reading

Posted in Mere Opinion | Tagged , , , | Comments Off on The Affordable Care Act is Safe (even with Justice Barrett)

Wait, What’s a “Textualist”?

Very, very broadly, the nation is divided into two camps on the substantive questions surrounding judicial nominations. Roughly half the nation supports textualism, and the other half supports the living tree doctrine. I doubt most people could actually name these doctrines, but it … Continue reading

Posted in Mere Opinion | Tagged , , | Comments Off on Wait, What’s a “Textualist”?

Five Kinds of Argument about Judicial Nominations (and Whether They Matter)

There are several types of arguments about nearly all judicial nominations in the modern United States. Given the debate over filling Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg’s seat, it is worth sorting out what those types are: 1. The Substantive Arguments: These … Continue reading

Posted in Mere Opinion | Tagged , , , , , , , , | Comments Off on Five Kinds of Argument about Judicial Nominations (and Whether They Matter)

Amy Coney Barrett’s Constitutional Canards Redux

About a year ago, on Facebook, I shared a lecture given by Judge Amy Coney Barrett of the 7th Circuit Court of Appeals, noting that: (1) it was an excellent lecture, and (2) she could well be the next Associate … Continue reading

Posted in Mere Opinion | Tagged , , | Comments Off on Amy Coney Barrett’s Constitutional Canards Redux

Retraction: Elector Freedom

Four years ago, I confidently informed my readers, in several places, that electors in the electoral college had a solemn responsibility to vote for the American they consider best qualified, not the candidate their party has “pledged” them to. So-called … Continue reading

Posted in Mere Opinion | Tagged , , | Comments Off on Retraction: Elector Freedom

A Viewer’s Guide to Outcomes in June Medical Services v. Gee

Tomorrow, the Supreme Court will hear the first significant abortion case since Justices Kavanaugh and Gorsuch joined the Court. You can read a lot of great analysis about it at SCOTUSBlog, including a symposium article by my friend and brilliant … Continue reading

Posted in Mere Opinion | Tagged , , , , | Comments Off on A Viewer’s Guide to Outcomes in June Medical Services v. Gee

Alito’s Concurrence in FUCT Case

I was surprised to see Justice Alito joining the Supreme Court majority in Iancu v. Brunetti today. This is a trademark case. The U.S. Trademark Office rejected a trademark for the brand “FUCT” because of a law (the Lanham Act) … Continue reading

Posted in Reads & Reactions | Tagged , , , , | Comments Off on Alito’s Concurrence in FUCT Case

A Kavanaugh Compromise

This post has been updated. See the bottom of the post for details. Senate Republicans should offer Senate Democrats a deal: (1) Kavanaugh is rejected. (2) Feinstein resigns or is expelled. (3) Expedited hearing schedule for Kavanaugh’s replacement… or no … Continue reading

Posted in Law, Politics | Tagged , , , , | 9 Comments

My Chat with Judge Hardiman (Or: Harriet Miers and the Hasty Tweet)

Last night, about an hour before Judge Thomas Hardiman of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit phoned me, I jumped into a Twitter thread: Not all of my readers were tuned into judicial politics back in the … Continue reading

Posted in Law | Tagged , , , , | 2 Comments

Justice Gorsuch and Net Neutrality

Nobody seems to have pointed this out yet, so I guess I might as well put something up quick. President Trump is not a big fan of net neutrality, and his new FCC commissioner, Ajit Pai, is, uh… really not … Continue reading

Posted in Law, Politics | Tagged , , , , , | 2 Comments